Avaliação das Capacidades Digitais em Relação à Estratégia Logística: Uma Revisão Bibliométrica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2026.v18i1.965Palavras-chave:
Logística, Indústria 4.0, Capacidades Digitais, Capacidades Dinâmicas, Estratégia Logística, Revisão BibliométricaResumo
Objetivo: Analisar a relação entre capacidades digitais, estratégia logística e implementação da Indústria 4.0 por meio de uma revisão bibliométrica da literatura científica, identificando os principais autores, instituições, palavras-chave, tecnologias emergentes, barreiras de implementação e perspectivas futuras relacionadas à logística estratégica e às capacidades dinâmicas.
Originalidade/Valor: O estudo contribui para o avanço teórico ao integrar capacidades digitais, capacidades dinâmicas e estratégia logística sob uma perspectiva sociobibliométrica. Além disso, amplia a discussão sobre a transição da Indústria 4.0 para a Indústria 5.0, destacando a necessidade de integração entre tecnologia, governança, sustentabilidade, cultura organizacional e valorização do capital humano. O artigo também apresenta evidências comparativas entre países desenvolvidos e em desenvolvimento, especialmente China e Índia.
Métodos: A pesquisa adotou uma abordagem bibliométrica baseada no protocolo de Tranfield, Denyer e Smart (2003). Os dados foram coletados na base Web of Science (WoS), abrangendo publicações entre 2016 e 2025. Inicialmente, 78 artigos foram analisados com auxílio do software VOSviewer para mapeamento de redes bibliométricas, análise de clusters, autores, instituições e palavras-chave. Adicionalmente, 61 artigos foram submetidos à codificação quantitativa e análise estatística utilizando o software JAMOVI, incluindo testes Qui-quadrado para avaliar associações entre contexto econômico, capacidades dinâmicas e fatores coercitivos e normativos.
Resultados: Os resultados demonstraram crescimento significativo das publicações sobre Indústria 4.0 e logística a partir de 2020, com pico em 2022. Os autores mais influentes identificados foram Dev et al. (2020) e Kristoffersen et al. (2020). As principais tecnologias associadas ao contexto logístico foram Internet das Coisas (IoT), Big Data Analytics e sistemas integrados da Indústria 4.0. As evidências indicam predominância de pesquisas em países em desenvolvimento, principalmente China e Índia. O estudo revelou que fatores financeiros, integração da cadeia de suprimentos e limitações de escalabilidade constituem as principais barreiras para implementação tecnológica. Os resultados também indicam que capacidades digitais como conectividade, visibilidade e continuidade são fundamentais para a evolução da logística estratégica, embora isoladamente não sejam suficientes para alcançar os princípios da Indústria 5.0.
Conclusões: Conclui-se que capacidades digitais representam elementos estratégicos essenciais para o fortalecimento da logística e da competitividade organizacional em ambientes dinâmicos e sustentáveis. Entretanto, a transformação digital exige integração entre tecnologia, governança, cultura organizacional, sustentabilidade e desenvolvimento de capacidades dinâmicas. O estudo reforça a necessidade de pesquisas futuras que aprofundem a relação entre capacidades digitais, desempenho logístico, resiliência organizacional e implementação da Indústria 5.0 em diferentes contextos econômicos.
Downloads
Referências
Albrecht, T., Baier, M. S., Gimpel, H., Meierhöfer, S., Röglinger, M., Schlüchtermann, J., & Will, L. (2024). Leveraging Digital Technologies in Logistics 4.0: Insights on Affordances from Intralogistics Processes. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(2), 755–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10394-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10394-6
Ali, S. S., Torğul, B., Paksoy, T., Luthra, S., & Kayikci, Y. (2024). A novel hybrid decision‐making framework for measuring Industry 4.0‐driven circular economy performance for textile industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(8), 7825-7854. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3892
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Management Journal, 14(1). John Wiley & amp; Sons. http://www.jstor.orgStableURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/2486548. Accessed:06/08/200818:28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105
Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., Nonino, F., Parida, V., & Pessot, E. (2021). Literature review on digitalization capabilities: Co-citation analysis of antecedents, conceptualization and consequences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120635
Assis, J. P. de, Sousa, R. P. de, & Linhares, P. C. F. (2020). Testes de Hipóteses estatísticas (EdFERSA, Ed.; 1st ed., Vol. 1). EdUFERSA.
Awan, U., Sroufe, R., & Bozan, K. (2022). Designing Value Chains for Industry 4.0 and a Circular Economy: A Review of the Literature. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127084
Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310391805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310391805
Bressanelli, G., Adrodegari, F., Perona, M., & Saccani, N. (2018). Exploring how usage-focused business models enable circular economy through digital technologies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(3), 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030639
Brookbanks, M., & Parry, G. C. (2024). The impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on the resilience of established cross-border supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 29(4), 731-754. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2023-0333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2023-0333
Ciliberto, C., Szopik-Depczyńska, K., Tarczyńska-Łuniewska, M., Ruggieri, A., & Ioppolo, G. (2021). Enabling the Circular Economy transition: a sustainable lean manufacturing recipe for Industry 4.0. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3255–3272. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2801
Damar, S., & Koksalmis, G. H. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of metaverse technologies in healthcare services. Service Business, 18(2), 223-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-024-00553-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-024-00553-3
Dev, N. K., Shankar, R., & Qaiser, F. H. (2020). Industry 4.0 and circular economy: Operational excellence for sustainable reverse supply chain performance. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104583
Domingos, E., Pereira, C., Armellini, F., Danjou, C., & Facchini, F. (2024). Enabling technologies as a support to achieve resilience in supply chain operations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 15292-15305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3477946
Durach, C. F., Kembro, J., & Wieland, A. (2017). A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(4), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12145
Facchini, F., Olésków-Szłapka, J., Ranieri, L., & Urbinati, A. (2020). A maturity model for logistics 4.0: An empirical analysis and a roadmap for future research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010086
Farooq, M. U., Hussain, A., Masood, T., & Habib, M. S. (2021). Supply chain operations management in pandemics: A state-of-the-art review inspired by covid-19. In Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5),1–33. DPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052504
Godina, R., Ribeiro, I., Matos, F., Ferreira, B. T., Carvalho, H., & Peças, P. (2020). Impact assessment of additive manufacturing on sustainable business models in industry 4.0 context. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177066
Gupta, H., Kumar Yadav, A., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Ahmed Khan, S., & Chandra Sharma, S. (2022). Strategies to overcome barriers to innovative digitalisation technologies for supply chain logistics resilience during pandemic. Technology in Society, 69. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5822-0933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101970
Gupta, S., Modgil, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Bag, S. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and institutional theories for Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain. Supply Chain Forum, 21(3), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2020.1757369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2020.1757369
Henríquez, R. D., Martínez, F.J. X., & Martínez Marín, J. E. Technological drivers of seaports' business model innovation: An exploratory case study on the port of Barcelona. Research in Transportation Business and Management. https://hdl.handle.net/2117/365094
Hsu, C. H., Cai, X. Q., Zhang, T. Y., & Ji, Y. L. (2024). Smart logistics facing industry 5.0: research on key enablers and strategic roadmap. Sustainability, 16(21), 9183. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219183
Huang, K., Wang, K., Lee, P. K. C., & Yeung, A. C. L. (2023). The impact of industry 4.0 on supply chain capability and supply chain resilience: A dynamic resource-based view. International Journal of Production Economics, 262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108913
Jinru, L., Changbiao, Z., Ahmad, B., Irfan, M., & Nazir, R. (2022). How do green financing and green logistics affect the circular economy in the pandemic situation: key mediating role of sustainable production. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 35(1), 3836–3856. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.2004437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.2004437
Kristoffersen, E., Blomsma, F., Mikalef, P., & Li, J. (2020). The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Research, 120, 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.044
Leitão, F. O., Paiva, E. L., Guarnieri, P., & Monteiro, L. C. (2024). Circularidade como capacidade dinâmica: uma revisão e uma agenda para uma transição circular. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 64(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020240306x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020240306
Li, G., Xue, J., Li, N., & Ivanov, D. (2022). Blockchain-supported business model design, supply chain resilience, and firm performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102773
Lohmer, J., Bugert, N., & Lasch, R. (2020). Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study. International Journal of Production Economics, 228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107882
Machado, S. T., & Moori, R. G. (2024). Perspectiva do impacto da blockchain em empresas do setor de alimentos: multicasos. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 16(1), e763-e763. https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2024.v16i1.763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2024.v16i1.763
Meirelles, D. S. e, & Camargo, Á. A. B. (2014). Capacidades Dinâmicas: O Que São e Como Identificá-las? Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 18(spe), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac20141289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac20141289
Min, S., Zacharia, Z. G., & Smith, C. D. (2019). Defining Supply Chain Management: In the Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12201
Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
Mvubu, M., & Naude, M. J. (2024). Digital transformation at third-party logistics providers: Challenges and best practices. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 18. https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v18i0.1023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/JTSCM.v18i0.1023
Nagy, J., Oláh, J., Erdei, E., Máté, D., & Popp, J. (2018). The role and impact of industry 4.0 and the internet of things on the business strategy of the value chain-the case of hungary. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103491
Pereira, R., & Cardoso, A. R. (2023). Qual a relevância da digitalização e adoção de componentes da indústria 4.0 para a internacionalização de pequenas e médias empresas portuguesas?. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies [FSRJ], 15(1), e0694. https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2023.v15i1.694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2023.v15i1.694
Pishdar, M., Danesh Shakib, M., Antucheviciene, J., & Vilkonis, A. (2021). Interval type-2 fuzzy super sbm network dea for assessing sustainability performance of third-party logistics service providers considering circular economy strategies in the era of industry 4.0. Sustainability, 13(11), 6497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116497
Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. (2014). Managing the Internet of Things: How smart, connected products are changing the competitive landscape. Harvard Business Review, 2016.
Preindl, R., Nikolopoulos, K., & Litsiou, K. (2020). Transformation Strategies for the Supply Chain: The Impact of Industry 4.0 and Digital Transformation. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2020.1716633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2020.1716633
Queiroz, M. M., Pereira, S. C. F., Telles, R., & Machado, M. C. (2019). Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain capabilities: A framework for understanding digitalisation challenges and opportunities. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(5), 1761–1782. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0435
Rad, F. F., Oghazi, P., Palmié, M., Chirumalla, K., Pashkevich, N., Patel, P. C., & Sattari, S. (2022). Industry 4.0 and supply chain performance: A systematic literature review of the benefits, challenges, and critical success factors of 11 core technologies. Industrial Marketing Management, 105, 268–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.06.009
Rakyta, M., Bubenik, P., Binasova, V., Micieta, B., & Staffenova, K. (2022). Advanced logistics strategy of a company to create sustainable development in the industrial area. Sustainability, 14(19), 12659. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912659
Richnák, P. (2022). Current trend of industry 4.0 in logistics and transformation of logistics processes using digital technologies: an empirical study in the Slovak republic. Logistics, 6(4), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6040079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6040079
Schilling, L., & Seuring, S. (2024). Linking the digital and sustainable transformation with supply chain practices. In International Journal of Production Research, 62(3), 949–973. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2173502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2173502
Sindakis, S., Showkat, S., & Su, J. (2023). Unveiling the influence: Exploring the impact of interrelationships among e-commerce supply chain members on supply chain sustainability. Sustainability, 15(24), 16642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416642
Tan, J., Tan, F. J., & Ramakrishna, S. (2022). Transitioning to a Circular Economy: A Systematic Review of Its Drivers and Barriers. In Sustainability, 14(3). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031757
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. In Strategic Management Journal, 18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3088148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. In British Journal of Management, 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Trstenjak, M., Opetuk, T., Đukić, G., & Cajner, H. (2022). Logistics 5.0 implementation model based on decision support systems. Sustainability, 14(11), 6514. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116514
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. In International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x
Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
Wheelwright, S. C., & Hayes, R. H. (1985). Competing Through Manufacturing. Harvard Business Review.
Yadav, S., Luthra, S., & Garg, D. (2021). Modelling Internet of things (IoT)-driven global sustainability in multi-tier agri-food supply chain under natural epidemic outbreaks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(13), 16633-16654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-84820/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11676-1
Zhang, F., Wu, X., Tang, C. S., Feng, T., & Dai, Y. (2020). Evolution of operations management research: From managing flows to building capabilities. Production and Operations Management, 29(10), 2219–2229. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13231
Zhang, G., Yang, Y., & Yang, G. (2023). Smart supply chain management in Industry 4.0: the review, research agenda and strategies in North America. Annals of Operations Research, 322(2), 1075–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04689-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04689-1
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Atribuição NãoComercial SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
• 9 The authors commit to serving as reviewers for the journal: As a form of reciprocity with the academic community, Future Studies reinforces the commitment that authors of accepted articles have to act as reviewers for manuscripts submitted to the journal.
Os artigos publicados estão licenciados sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - Não comercial - Sem derivações 4.0 Internacional.
