Servitization meets sustainability


  • Henrique Luiz Correa School of Business Rollins College



Service management, Servitization, Operations management, Brazil, Sustainability


Companies that have traditionally sold physical products have begun to increase “services” offered alongside the product.  Sometimes businesses have even gone to the extreme of selling only the “benefit” of the physical good as a service, while retaining ownership of the service-supporting good, such as the Xerox copier in your office. This movement is frequently referred to as “servitization” (Baines et al. 2009), which is sometimes illustrated by the popular saying: “people don't want to buy a quarter-inch drill. They want a quarter-inch hole.” We argue that, with servitization, because the supplying company retain ownership of the physical good supporting the service provided, the company is incentivized to put increased efforts, from design to disposal of the physical good, into designing in processes that will maximize the value that can be recouped from the good after the end of its economic life. This would be consistent with efforts toward increased sustainability in supply chains. In the traditional transactional sale of physical goods companies does not have an incentive to make decisions aimed at keeping the value of the product throughout its economic life. Companies would not be interested in extending its economic life either, or even being concerned about how reusable, remanufacture-able, refurbish-able or recyclable the product is. This has implications for the level of environmental sustainability achieved.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Henrique Luiz Correa, School of Business Rollins College

Crummer Graduate School of Business, Rollins College, florida, (USA). Professor of Operations Management



Baines, T.S., Lightfoot, H.W., Benedettini, O., Kay, J.M. (2009). The servitization of manufacturing: A review of literature and reflection on future challenges. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(5).

Braungart, M. and McDonough, W. (2002). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press, New York.

Brundtland Report (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. United Nations. Accessed on 05/04/2018.

Corrêa, H. L. and C. A. Corrêa (2006). “A critical analysis of the product-service dichotomy in operations management.” Latin America Business Review. 6(4)

Corrêa, H. L. and C. A. Corrêa (2017). Administração de Produção e Operações. 4th edition. Atlas/GEN, São Paulo, 2017.

Corrêa, H. L., Ellram, L., Scavarda, A. and Cooper, M. (2007). An operations management view of the services and goods offering mix. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(5).

Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: win–win–win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review 36 (2), 90–100.

Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of the 21st Century. New Society Publishers, Stoney Creek.

Heskett, J.L., Sasser, W.E., Schlesinger, L.A. (1997). The Service Profit Chain. The Free Press (Simon-Schuster), New York.

Murray, A., Skene, K. & Haynes, K. (2017) The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context. Journal of Business Ethics. 140(3)

Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G. (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review. May-Jun.

Wandermerwe, S. and Rada, J. (1988) Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services. European Management Journal, 6(4), winter, Elsevier.




How to Cite

Correa, H. L. (2018). Servitization meets sustainability. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 10(2), 358–364.