Abstract
O objetivo, neste artigo, foi apresentar as frentes e agenda futura da pesquisa sobre a influência dos executivos no desempenho das empresas na perspectiva da Teoria do Alto Escalão. Para atingir este objetivo, realizamos uma revisão sistemática de 59 artigos, procedentes de um estudo bibliométrico de pareamento.Os resultados da pesquisa indicam que, a partir do trabalho seminal de Hambrick e Mason (1984), os estudos atuais, além de considerarem as características demográficas do CEO (Chief Executive Officer), têm dado ênfase à influência da diversidade do TMT (Top Management Team) sobre os conflitos entre executivos e conselheiros, aos efeitos do comportamento e relações sociais e a análises semelhantes em outros níveis organizacionais. A partir destas análises, é proposta uma agenda de pesquisa.References
Acar, F. P. (2010). Analyzing the effects of diversity perceptions and shared leadership on emotional conflict: a dynamic approach, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(10), 1733-1753.
Acedo, F., Barroso, C., & Galan, J. (2006). The resource-based theory: Dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 621–636.
Barkema, H. G. & Shvyrkov, O. (2007). Does Top Management Team Diversity Promote or Hamper Foreign Expansion? Strategic Management Journal. 28: 663-680.
Barr, P. S. (1998). A dapting to Unfamiliar Environmental Events: A Look at the Evolution of Interpretation and Its Role in Strategic Change. Organization Science 9(6):644-669.
Bazeley, P. (2013). Comparative analyses as a means of furthering analysis. Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies. London: Sage.
Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting Specific about Demographic Diversity Variable and Team Performance Relationships: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 709–743.
Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Conceptual Models. Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systemic Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Bergh, D., Aguinis, H., Heavey, C., Ketchen, D., Boyd, B., Su, P., Lau, C. & Joo, H. (2016). Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 477–497.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bradley, R. V., Byrd, T., Pridmore, J., Thrasher, E. H. & Pratt, R. M. E. (2012). An empirical examination of antecedents and consequences of its governance in US Hospitals. Journal of Information Technology, 27(2): 156-177.
Carmeli, A. (2008). Top Management Team Behavioral Integration and the Performance of Service Organizations. Group & Organization Management, 33(6), 712–735.
Carmeli, A. & Halevi, M. Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2): 207-218.
Carmeli, A., Sheaffer, Z. & Halevi, M. Y. (2009) Does participatory decision‐making in top management teams enhance decision effectiveness and firm performance? Personnel Review, 38(6), 696-714.
Carmeli, A., Tishler, A., & Edmondson, A. C. (2012). CEO relational leadership and strategic decision quality in top management teams: The role of team trust and learning from failure. Strategic Organization, 10(1), 31–54.
Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A. & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition. Journal of Management. 30(6): 749-778.
Castanias, R. & Helfat, C. (2001). The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Management, 27: 661–678.
Charvet, F. F., Cooper, M. C. & Gardner, J. T. (2008). The intellectual structure of supply chain management: a bibliometric approach. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1): 47-73.
Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Executive Personality, Capability Cues, and Risk Taking: How Narcissistic CEOs React to Their Successes and Stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 202–237.
Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W., Miller, C., & Huber, G. (1999). Determinants of Executive Beliefs: Comparing Functional Conditioning and Social Influence. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8): 763-789.
Chen, D. Q., Mocker, M., Preston, D. S. & Teubner, A. (2010). Information systems strategy: reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Quarterly. 34 (2): 233-259.
Chen, D. Q., Preston D. S. & Xia, W. (2010). Antecedents and Effects of CIO Supply-Side and Demand-Side Leadership: A Staged Maturity Model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 231–271.
Chi, N.-W., Huang, Y.-M., & Lin, S.-C. (2009). A Double-Edged Sword? Exploring the Curvilinear Relationship Between Organizational Tenure Diversity and Team Innovation: The Moderating Role of Team-Oriented HR Practices. Group & Organization Management, 34(6), 698–726.
Child, J. (1972). Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice. Sociology, 6(1): 1-22.
Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. (2007). How National Systems Differ in Their Constraints on Corporate Executives: A Study of CEO Effects in Three Countries. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 767-789.
Crossland, C. & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Differences in managerial discretion across countries: how nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEO matters. Strategic Management Jounal, 32 (8), 797-819.
Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
De Wit, F. R. C.; Greer, L. L. & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The Paradox of Intragroup Conflict: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97 (2), 360-390.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review. 48, 147-160.
Eisenhardt, K. M. & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory. The Academy of Management Journal. 31(4): 737-770.
Elbanna, S. & Child, J. (2007). The Influence of Decision, Environmental and Firm Characteristics on the Rationality of Strategic Decision‐Making. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 561-591.
Ferreira, M. A. S. P. V., Pinto, C. S. F., Serra, F. A. R. & Santos, J. C. (2013). A bibliometric study of John Dunning’s contribution to international business research. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 15(46): 56-75.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 484–503.
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. The Academy of Management Review. 32(2): 334-343.
Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: a bridge between polar views of organizations. 369-406. in: Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (eds). Research in organizational behavior. V.9. Greenwich. JAI Press.
Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S. & Mooney, A. (2005). Executive job demands: new insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3): 472–491.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper Echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology model of organizations. American Journal of Sociology. 82: 929-964.
Hjertø, K.B., Kuvaas, B. (2009). Development and empirical exploration of an extended model of intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management (20)1, 4-30.
Horwitz, S. K. & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33 (6), 987-1015.
Jehn, K. A., Rispens, S., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2010). The effects of conflict asymmetry on work group and individual outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 596-616.
Joshi, A., Liao, H., & Roh, H. (2011). Bridging Domains in Workplace Demography Research: A Review and Reconceptualization. Journal of Management, 37(2), 521–552.
Karaevli, A. (2007), Performance consequences of new CEO ‘Outsiderness’: Moderating effects of pre‐ and post‐succession contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 681-706.
Kearns, G. S. & Sabherwal, R. (2007). Antecedents and Consequences of Information Systems Planning Integration. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54 (4): 628-643.
Kessler, M.M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14: 10–25.
Kidwell, R.E., Kellermanns, F.W. & Eddleston, K.A. (2012). Harmony, Justice, Confusion, and Conflict in Family Firms: Implications for Ethical Climate and the “Fredo Effect”. Journal of Business Ethics, 106 (4): 503-517.
Kleinbaum, A., & Tushman, M. L. (2007), Building bridges: the social structure of interdependent innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1: 103-122.
Korsgaard, M. A., Soyoung Jeong, S., Mahony, D. M. & Pitariu, A. H. (2008). A Multilevel View of Intragroup Conflict. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1222–1252.
Kunze, F., & Bruch, H. (2010). Age-Based Faultlines and Perceived Productive Energy: The Moderation of Transformational Leadership. Small Group Research, 41(5), 593–620.
Lau, D.C. & Murnighan, J.K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23: 325–340.
Lawrence, B.S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8(1): 1–22.
Leidner, D. E., Preston, D. & Chen, D. (2010). An eximination of antecedents and consequences of organizational IT innovation in hospitals. The Journal of Strategis Information Systems, 19 (3): 154-170.
Lin, T. & Cheng, Y. (2010). Exploring the knowledge network of strategic alliance research: A co-citation analysis. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 8(2): 152–160.
Lin, W-T., Cheng, Y. & Liu, Y. (2009). Organizational slack and firm’s internationalization: a longitudinal study of high-technology firms. Journal of World Business, 44: 397-406.
Lin, W-T. & Liu,Y. (2011). The impact of CEO sucession on top management teams and the degree of firm internationalization. European Journal International Management, 5(3): 253-270.
Lin, W-T. & Liu,Y. (2012). Successor characteristics, organisational slack, and change in the degree of firm internationalization. International Business Review, 21: 89-101.
Liu, Y., Lin, W-T. & Cheng, K-Y. (2011). Family Ownership and the International Involvement of Taiwan’s High-Technology Firms: The Moderating Effect of High-Discretion Organizational Slack. Management and Organization Review, 7 (2): 201-222.
Liu, Y., Valenti, M. A. and Yu, H. (2012), Presuccession Performance, CEO Succession, Top Management Team, and Change in a Firm's Internationalization: The Moderating Effect of CEO/Chairperson Dissimilarity. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 29: 67-78.
Lu, L., Zhou, F. & Leung, K. (2011) Effects of task and relationship conflicts on individual work behaviors, International Journal of Conflict Management, 22 (2): 131-150.
Mackey, A. (2008), The effect of CEOs on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1357-1367.
Markóczy, L. (2001), Consensus formation during strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 1013-1031.
Martin, J. A. (2011). Dynamic Managerial Capabilities and the Multibusiness Team: The Role of Episodic Teams in Executive Leadership Groups. Organization Science, 22 (1): 118-140.
McCain, K. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6): 433-443.
Medeiros, R., Serra, F. A. R. & Ferreira, M. A. P. (2011). O tempo de mandato do CEO e o desempenho das organizações: Um estudo em grandes empresas brasileiras. Revista Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gestão, 10: 60–69.
Nadkarni, S. & Barr, P. S. (2008). Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: an integrated view. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1395-1427.
Nagaratnam, S., Ebrahim, N., & Habibullah M. (2016). A bibliometric analysis on “fertility rate” research trends. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 1(1), 1-14.
Nielsen, S. (2009). Why do top management teams look the way they do? A multilevel exploration of the antecedents of TMT heterogeneity. Strategic Organization, 7(3): 277–305.
Nielsen, S. (2010). Top Management Team Diversity: A Review of Theories and Methodologies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 (3): 301-316.
Olson, B. J., Parayitam, S., & Bao, Y. (2007). Strategic Decision Making: The Effects of Cognitive Diversity, Conflict, and Trust on Decision Outcomes. Journal of Management, 33(2): 196–222.
Oppong, S. (2014). Upper echelons theory revisited: the need for a change from causal description to causal explanation. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 19(2): 169-183.
Parayitam, S. & Dooley, R. S. (2007) The relationship between conflict and decision outcomes: Moderating effects of cognitive‐ and affect‐based trust in strategic decision‐making teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18 (1), 42-73.
Parayitam, S., & Dooley, R. S. (2009). The interplay between cognitive- and affective conflict and cognition- and affect-based trust in influencing decision outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 62(8): 789-796.
Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D. & Fox, C. R. (2011), Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1369-1386.
Preston, D. S., Chen, D., & Leidner, D. E. (2008). Examining the antecedents and consequences of CIO strategic decision-making authority: An empirical study. Decision Sciences, 39(4): 605-642.
Puck, J.; Neyer, A-K. & Dennerlein, T. (2010) Diversity and conflict in teams: a contingency perspective. European Journal of International Management, 4 (4): 417-439.
Quigley, T. J. & Hambrick, D. C. (2015). Has the "CEO effect" increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America's attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6): 821-830.
Ramos-Rodriguez, A., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10): 981–1004.
Rost, K. and Osterloh, M. (2010), Opening the Black Box of Upper Echelons: Drivers of Poor Information Processing During the Financial Crisis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18: 212-233.
Sabherwal, R. (1999). The Relationship Between Information System Planning Sophistication and Information System Success: An Empirical Assessment. Decision Sciences, 30(1): 137-167.
Serra, F. A. R & Lissone, J. (2006). Los pilares de la estratégia y el éxito de las organizaciones. Revista de Empresa, 18: 36-48.
Serra, F. A. R. & Ferreira, M. A. P. (2010). Emerging determinants of firm performance: A case study research examining the strategy pillars from a resource-based view. Management Research, 8: 7–24.
Serra, F. A. R., Ferreira, M. A. P., Guerrazzi, L., & Scaciotta, V. (2018). Doing Bibliometric Reviews for the Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management. Iberoamerican Journal Of Strategic Management, 17(3): 01-16.
Serra, F. R., Tres, G., & Ferreira, M.P. (2016). The “CEO effect” on the performance of Brazilian companies: An empirical study using measurable characteristics. European Management Review. 13(3): 193-205.
Shafique, M. (2013). Thinking inside the box? Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988–2008). Strategic Management Journal, 34(1): 62–93.
Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (4): 597-624.
Stingl, V., & Geraldi, J. (2017). Errors, lies and misunderstandings: Systematic review on behavioural decision making in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(20, 121-135.
Talke, K.; Salomo, S. & Rost, K. (2010) How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy, 39 (7): 907-918.
Tallon, P. P. (2007b). Does IT pay to focus? An analysis of IT business value under single and multi-focused business strategies. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16: 278-300.
Tallon, P. P. & Kraemer, K. (2007). Fact or Fiction? A Sensemaking Perspective on the Reality behind Executives' Perceptions of IT Business Value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1): 13-54.
Tallon, P. P. (2007a). A Process-Oriented Perspective on the Alignment of Information Technology and Business Strategy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3): 227-268.
Tegarden, D.P., Tegarden, L.F. & Sheetz, S.D. (2009). Cognitive Factions in a Top Management Team: Surfacing and Analyzing Cognitive Diversity using Causal Maps. Group Decision and Negotiaton. 18(6): 537-566.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222.
Tuggle, C., Schnatterly, K., & Johnson, R. (2010). Attention Patterns in the Boardroom: How Board Composition and Processes Affect Discussion of Entrepreneurial Issues. The Academy of Management Journal, 53(3): 550-571.
van Knippenberg, D., Dawson, J. F., West, M. A., & Homan, A. C. (2011). Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance. Human Relations, 64(3): 307–336.
van Knippenberg, D. & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A Critical Assessment of Charismatic Transformational Leadership Research: Back to the Drawing Board? Academy of Management Annals, 7(1): 1-60.
Vogel, R. & Güttel, W. 2013. The dynamic capability view in strategic management: a bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4): 426-446.
Wangrow, D. B., Schepker, D. J. & Barker, V. L., III (2015). Managerial discretion: an empirical review and focus on future research directions. Journal of Management, 41(1): 99-135.
White, H. (2011). Scientific and Scholarly Networks. In P. J. Carrington & J. Scott (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis (pp. 271–285). London: SAGE Publications.
White, H. D. and Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of Association for Infromation Science and Technology, 32: 163-171.
Williams, H. M., Parker, S. K., & Turner, N. (2007). Perceived Dissimilarity and Perspective Taking Within Work Teams. Group & Organization Management, 32(5): 569–597.
Yang, Q.; Zimmerman, M. & Jiang, C. (2011). An Empirical Study of the Impact of CEO Characteristics on New Firms' Time to IPO. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(2): 163-184.
Yukl, G. (2008). How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 19: 708-722.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3): 429–472.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Atribuição NãoComercial SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
• 9 The authors commit to serving as reviewers for the journal: As a form of reciprocity with the academic community, Future Studies reinforces the commitment that authors of accepted articles have to act as reviewers for manuscripts submitted to the journal.